17:43:16 ccl-logbot [~ccl-logbo@setf.clozure.com] has joined #scheme 17:43:16 17:43:16 -!- names: ccl-logbot copumpkin emporas myu2 jewel jonrafkind new2net dzhus gozoner foocraft pdlogan corruptmemory tronador_ mmc1 adu carleastlund jesusito bweaver eli tupi__ bttf paulh_ Agari Gmind masm zmv vilsonvieira tauntaun gravicappa pdelgallego peterhil` tupi nilg pchrist vu3rdd vk0 samth mmc sstrickl HG` user18 evhan timj__ offby1 githogori Riastradh Khisanth Obfuscate Caleb-- pothos z0d Nisstyre preflex kniu danking tessier ada2358 Leonidas derrida 17:43:16 -!- names: alexgordon pjb tizoc simontwo ve Tasser rrm3 DerGuteMoritz bpalmer ray rins rdd langmartin MapMan martinhex lithpr kanru ASau augiedoggie incubot klutometis Hal9k Jafet lechon copec felipe borism aidalgol eno mario-goulart inimino zbigniew eut mornfall jimrees__ Euthydemus oivindbi_ snarkyboojum cpach pantsd_ d2biG foof elf aoh acarrico ski snorble cky bremner sjamaan jeapostrophe jl_2 metasyntax bzzbzz yx rudybot nome joast timchen1a dfeuer Pepe_ 17:43:16 -!- names: C-Keen Zahl XTL amoe zilt weinholt tonyg jeff___ rmrfchik Axioplase_ ecraven ineiros churib leppie clog_ tmi jao arbscht sloyd futilius twem2_ incandenza stepnem pippin _p4bl0 Kovensky neilcj askhader em Nshag pl6 Adamant Gertm chrissbx qsun dsmith nowhereman araujo fds antoszka rapacity pr yosafbridge Adrinael certaint1 cmatei Zol gnomon ToxicFrog `micro ozzloy qebab rotty elly peddie 17:43:49 or appendIamQuiteSurprised 17:44:10 -!- Caleb-- is now known as Caleb- 17:44:32 -!- Caleb- is now known as Caleb-- 17:44:52 oh, that is actually an acceptable workaround by the java coding standards (lol) 17:45:28 appendZOMG 17:47:18 no... you would have to spell it out like this. appendZeeOhhMyGod 17:47:42 or, appendZeeOhhEmGee 17:47:59 -!- pippin [~pippin@li146-77.members.linode.com] has left #scheme 17:49:17 appendWarningThisProcedureHasASideEffect 17:49:40 Blkt [~user@93-33-113-71.ip44.fastwebnet.it] has joined #scheme 17:50:18 awtphase() 17:50:52 kilimanjaro [~kilimanja@unaffiliated/kilimanjaro] has joined #scheme 17:51:23 oh... what is the side effect? 17:51:44 it mutates the list 17:51:58 is it still a "proper" list? 17:52:03 so if someone else has a refenrece to that list, magically their reference gets changed 17:52:17 yea its still proper 17:53:04 fantazo [~fantazo@178-191-175-107.adsl.highway.telekom.at] has joined #scheme 17:53:06 magic ftw 17:53:22 lol, well they don't have to use appendExclamationMark if they don't want to. 17:54:13 probably in java id call it appendMutate() or something 17:56:15 -!- kilimanjaro [~kilimanja@unaffiliated/kilimanjaro] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 17:56:57 kilimanjaro [~kilimanja@unaffiliated/kilimanjaro] has joined #scheme 17:56:59 homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 18:01:31 Sveklo [~sveklo@unaffiliated/sveklo] has joined #scheme 18:01:41 -!- Sveklo [~sveklo@unaffiliated/sveklo] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 18:01:46 Sveklo [~sveklo@unaffiliated/sveklo] has joined #scheme 18:02:10 wbooze [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 18:06:39 -!- tronador_ [~guille@190.145.89.146] has quit [Quit: tronador_] 18:11:33 you could take a common lisp-ish approach to names - hook? => hook_p for predicate and hook! => hook_m for mutator. 18:13:20 (advantage of the underscore is you really want these names to stand out, so make them *un* like java's conventions) 18:17:39 OTOH, every java programmer is going to ask WTP is that. 18:17:51 appendFactoryMutateImpl? 18:18:21 (on a more serious note i would use _m _p suffixes too) 18:19:43 drdo [~user@91.205.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has joined #scheme 18:23:52 pygospa [~pygospa@kiel-4d066a2f.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #scheme 18:27:31 who uses scheme for parsing logfiles? 18:30:59 -!- user18 [~user@p5B2A9CE6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 18:31:05 user17 [~user@p5B2A9CE6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #scheme 18:37:20 -!- kilimanjaro [~kilimanja@unaffiliated/kilimanjaro] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 18:46:41 -!- tupi__ [~david@139.82.89.24] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 18:46:54 Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has joined #scheme 18:48:15 levi [~user@c-174-52-219-147.hsd1.ut.comcast.net] has joined #scheme 18:50:57 -!- Gmind [~Nevermind@123.16.111.52] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 18:52:47 -!- Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 18:59:52 -!- adu [~ajr@softbank220043139062.bbtec.net] has quit [Quit: adu] 19:02:38 -!- corruptmemory [~jim@96.246.167.18] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 19:08:55 -!- Hal9k [~Lernaean@unaffiliated/kusanagi] has quit [] 19:16:13 -!- peterhil` [~peterhil@a91-153-127-82.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 19:17:19 aca20031 [~aca20031@vps1.benbuzbee.com] has joined #scheme 19:17:35 How would one convert an atom read by (read) into a string passable to (open-input-file (read)) 19:17:36 zanes [~zane@wall.tripitinc.com] has joined #scheme 19:17:44 atm that says its not a path name 19:17:45 -!- nilg [~user@77.70.2.229] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 19:18:47 tronador_ [~guille@190.145.89.146] has joined #scheme 19:19:35 kilimanjaro [~kilimanja@unaffiliated/kilimanjaro] has joined #scheme 19:21:20 aca20031: symbol->string 19:21:50 cky I read that and tried something like this 19:21:57 (set-current-input-port! (open-input-file (read)->string)) 19:22:02 But thats apparently quite wrong 19:22:37 Step back a moment. What more general problem are you trying to solve, of which you believe futzing with READ and OPEN-INPUT-FILE and so on to be a subproblem? 19:22:55 tupi__ [~david@139.82.89.24] has joined #scheme 19:23:02 just trying to ask the ocnsole for a file name to set the input port to 19:23:04 console* 19:23:16 aca20031: You may want to use read-line, not read. 19:23:20 Zawinski's law: Every software package expands until it can send email. 19:23:22 read isn't particularly good for reading a file name. 19:23:33 read-line isn't standard, but many implementations support it. 19:24:11 aca20031, READ may return any of a variety of different kinds of objects. If you want to input a string to READ, you'll have to type double-quotes. 19:24:14 I see, thanks cky 19:24:23 ;Aborting!: maximum recursion depth exceeded 19:24:25 Riastradh also noted 19:24:28 does this error imply an infinite loop? 19:24:37 bttf, usually, yes. 19:24:44 -!- wbooze [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 19:24:44 -!- homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 19:24:48 ok 19:24:56 Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has joined #scheme 19:26:39 -!- Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has quit [Client Quit] 19:27:42 Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has joined #scheme 19:34:40 femtoo [~femto@95-89-248-52-dynip.superkabel.de] has joined #scheme 19:36:02 wav1 [~Adium@184-209-90-52.pools.spcsdns.net] has joined #scheme 19:39:36 stamourv [~user@ahuntsic.ccs.neu.edu] has joined #scheme 19:40:24 -!- acarrico [~acarrico@pppoe-68-142-62-150.gmavt.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 19:42:00 mippymoe [~mathguru1@c-24-11-171-16.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has joined #scheme 19:46:02 acarrico [~acarrico@pppoe-68-142-62-150.gmavt.net] has joined #scheme 19:47:17 how does one set the input port back to stdin 19:48:21 -!- pdelgallego [~pdelgalle@1385159852.dhcp.dbnet.dk] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 19:49:56 rasterbar [~rasterbar@unaffiliated/rasterbar] has joined #scheme 19:52:23 -!- jewel [~jewel@196-215-117-46.dynamic.isadsl.co.za] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 19:52:47 aca20031, i guess you need to save a reference to it and then set it later on 19:52:53 I'd like to know this. Once I did `(define standard-output (current-output-port))' and then changed the output port 19:53:03 But, I'm not sure if that's the best way 19:53:04 dralston [~dralston@S0106687f74a12729.va.shawcable.net] has joined #scheme 19:53:36 aca20031, depends on what Scheme system you're using -- SET-CURRENT-INPUT-PORT! is not a standard procedure in the first place. 19:53:44 interesting. Well then a simple question, and you may just link me to some article but im not sure how to google this and cant find anything, if I have the S-expression (display "test") which was read from a file, how can I execute it 19:54:01 (eval) 19:54:10 (eval expression (scheme-report-environment 5)), if you're using the R5RS. 19:54:45 -!- Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has quit [Quit: Benjohn] 19:56:34 Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has joined #scheme 19:57:27 funny that googling "evaluate s-expression" didnt turn that up 20:01:10 unbound variable scheme report environment hmm... 20:01:25 What Scheme system are you using? 20:01:35 MIT scheme is all I can tell you 20:02:24 http://sicp.ai.mit.edu/Fall-2003/manuals/scheme-7.5.5/doc/scheme_14.html 20:02:36 Oh...right, I forgot that MIT Scheme doesn't have that. I'll just go fix that. 20:02:41 Yikes! You're not using 7.5.5, are you? 20:03:08 I dont see a version, only Image saved 3/9/2010 20:03:16 -!- mippymoe [~mathguru1@c-24-11-171-16.hsd1.mi.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 20:03:29 It should say `Release 9.0.1' or `Release 7.7.90+' or something like that. 20:03:38 9.0.1 20:03:50 OK. 20:04:16 Anyway, you can use (->environment '()) instead of (scheme-report-environment 5), approximately. 20:04:29 (Sorry, I sent an outdated link. :-[ ) 20:04:30 freaky 20:04:52 I must be missing something, this teacher mentions nothing about any of this yet we're supposed to write a translator that translates one language to scheme and executes it.. 20:04:58 (Oops -- I didn't notice that it was dralston and not aca20031 who posted the link.) 20:05:25 aca20031, is your problem set on the web somewhere? 20:05:37 http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~engelen/courses/COP4020/ 20:05:45 I mean its an entire project, he gives us a lot of functions 20:05:48 but I see nothing about eval :9 20:06:04 maytbe you're suppose to write an intepreter 20:06:07 which is basically eval 20:07:45 this is a programming language class, not a scheme class, he went over basic syntax and moved one :( Thanks for the help, I managed to get a functional prompt/fileread/run scheme code going lol 20:07:58 peterhil` [~peterhil@a91-153-127-82.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #scheme 20:08:39 Yikes! 20:08:58 Hal9k [~Lernaean@unaffiliated/kusanagi] has joined #scheme 20:09:42 -!- rasterbar [~rasterbar@unaffiliated/rasterbar] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 20:10:24 First, neither you nor your instructor should use SET-CURRENT-INPUT-PORT! here (or just about anywhere, for that matter; I don't think I have ever used it). Second, your project description does say to use EVAL, together with THE-ENVIRONMENT, although you really don't want to use THE-ENVIRONMENT either, which is a relic that Scheme was mostly rid of decades ago... 20:11:23 does it? Strange, I even did a ctrl+f on it 20:11:28 maybe im getting a head of myself 20:12:09 I glanced at . It's on page 10. 20:12:13 -!- Agari [~Agari@4.Red-95-121-141.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:12:49 -!- dralston [~dralston@S0106687f74a12729.va.shawcable.net] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 20:13:07 Instead of (begin (set-current-input-port! (open-input-file filename)) (statement (read))), as given on page 5, write (call-with-input-file filename (lambda (port) (statement (read port)))). If you use SET-CURRENT-INPUT-PORT!, then, as you observed, standard input goes away! (You can get it back in MIT Scheme with (set-current-input-port! console-input-port) -- but only in MIT Scheme.) 20:13:29 ah chrome is just stupid and doesnt search the inner frame 20:13:50 Many of those notes are confused and/or wrong. 20:14:11 I solved it with a define stdout beforehand but most of this is my learning, im going to scrap it because he doesnt even request a file or anything 20:14:15 Sorry, using CALL-WITH-INPUT-FILE doesn't work, because STATEMENT wants to read input too. However, (with-input-from-file filename (lambda () (statement (read)))) will work. 20:14:17 he has you type in manually (convert "file") 20:14:52 good to know half of its wrong though, lol. Hes supposedly some big shot plang guy who got rich inventing Apple Script 20:14:58 but apparently not doing scheme 20:16:41 -!- Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has quit [Quit: Benjohn] 20:17:54 DrDuck [~duck@216.186.151.63] has joined #scheme 20:19:26 Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has joined #scheme 20:19:44 -!- jesusito [~user@220.pool85-49-234.dynamic.orange.es] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 20:21:50 -!- gravicappa [~gravicapp@ppp85-141-166-110.pppoe.mtu-net.ru] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:25:35 There's no statement in scheme. Try: (with-input-from-file filename (lambda () (expression (read)))) ;-) 20:26:28 pjb, this is a program in Scheme that reasons about another language, not Scheme. 20:26:41 pjb: begin ? 20:27:00 rudybot: (set! a (begin 1 2)) 20:27:01 pjb: error: set!: cannot set undefined variable: a 20:27:06 rudybot: (define a (begin 1 2)) 20:27:07 pjb: Done. 20:27:11 rudybot: a 20:27:12 pjb: ; Value: 2 20:27:13 bremner, (BEGIN ...) is either a definition or an expression, depending on what is in the ellipsis. 20:27:49 ok, but it quacks a bit like a sequence of statements 20:28:15 Yes, PROGN CL name is better. 20:28:21 -!- DrDuck [~duck@216.186.151.63] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 20:28:39 `Statement' is a ridiculous word for its purpose in languages such as C, anyway. It's not a statement -- not a logical proposition, or declaration. It's a command. 20:28:51 x = y; /* In C, this is not a statement of fact. It is a command to be executed! */ 20:28:51 Right. 20:29:01 sure. normal english pretty weird too. 20:29:12 DrDuck [~duck@216.186.151.63] has joined #scheme 20:30:12 "action" is not bad. Maybe the monad-ists are on to something ;) 20:30:52 It's not really an action, either. The action is what the machine does to follow the command. 20:31:19 -!- fantazo [~fantazo@178-191-175-107.adsl.highway.telekom.at] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 20:39:45 homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 20:43:15 fantazo [~fantazo@178-190-237-31.adsl.highway.telekom.at] has joined #scheme 20:43:23 wbooze [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 20:43:24 -!- homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has quit [Client Quit] 20:43:34 nilg [~user@77.70.2.229] has joined #scheme 20:43:38 rpg [~rpg@mpls.sift.info] has joined #scheme 20:49:43 homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 20:49:50 -!- dfeuer [~dfeuer@wikimedia/Dfeuer] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 20:50:02 arcfide [1000@140-182-147-236.dhcp-bl.indiana.edu] has joined #scheme 20:50:05 gravicappa [~gravicapp@ppp85-141-167-145.pppoe.mtu-net.ru] has joined #scheme 20:50:08 -!- arcfide [1000@140-182-147-236.dhcp-bl.indiana.edu] has left #scheme 20:52:20 -!- HG` [~HG@xdsl-188-118-137-45.dip.osnanet.de] has quit [Quit: HG`] 20:53:03 HG` [~HG@xdsl-188-118-137-45.dip.osnanet.de] has joined #scheme 20:53:11 -!- tupi__ [~david@139.82.89.24] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 20:53:38 -!- homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has quit [Client Quit] 20:53:45 -!- wbooze [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)] 20:53:51 -!- Benjohn [~benjohn@91.107.32.235] has quit [Quit: Benjohn] 20:57:36 pnkfelix [~Adium@c-68-38-142-34.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #scheme 20:59:16 -!- gozoner [~ebg@64.134.236.202] has quit [Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.] 21:00:35 -!- araujo [~araujo@gentoo/developer/araujo] has quit [Read error: Operation timed out] 21:00:44 homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 21:01:17 -!- new2net is now known as N2N 21:01:46 araujo [~araujo@gentoo/developer/araujo] has joined #scheme 21:02:59 dfeuer [~dfeuer@pool-71-178-165-121.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has joined #scheme 21:02:59 -!- dfeuer [~dfeuer@pool-71-178-165-121.washdc.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Changing host] 21:02:59 dfeuer [~dfeuer@wikimedia/Dfeuer] has joined #scheme 21:07:07 wbooze [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 21:21:32 -!- HG` [~HG@xdsl-188-118-137-45.dip.osnanet.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 21:24:38 -!- dzhus [~sphinx@93-80-97-1.broadband.corbina.ru] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 21:29:10 Riastradh: I like the term "imperative" as in "imperative programming"... 21:29:15 n1. something that is urgent or essential 2. an order or command 21:38:52 HG` [~HG@xdsl-188-118-137-45.dip.osnanet.de] has joined #scheme 21:42:50 yapsol [yapsol@189.98.174.35] has joined #scheme 21:42:57 -!- yapsol [yapsol@189.98.174.35] has quit [Client Quit] 21:45:28 -!- drdo [~user@91.205.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 21:49:53 Why isn't the empty list self-evaluating? 21:50:00 (Except in MIT Scheme) 21:50:26 it is! 21:50:30 rudybot: eval (list) 21:50:32 C-Keen: your sandbox is ready 21:50:32 C-Keen: ; Value: () 21:50:45 rudybot: eval () 21:50:46 fds: your sandbox is ready 21:50:47 fds: error: eval:1:0: #%app: missing procedure expression; probably originally (), which is an illegal empty application in: (#%app) 21:50:51 Is what I meant. :-P 21:50:55 that's not a valid syntax in scheme 21:51:02 Right, I know that! 21:51:03 -!- langmartin [~user@exeuntcha2.tva.gov] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)] 21:51:04 -!- N2N is now known as new2net 21:51:16 fds, some people found it aesthetically displeasing. 21:51:26 Hm 21:51:32 After all, a list is supposed to be a combination -- it's supposed to apply some operator to some operands. 21:52:13 I see. 21:52:30 gozoner [~ebg@ip68-6-68-92.sb.sd.cox.net] has joined #scheme 21:53:27 But, there's nothing fundamentally wrong with having `()' evaluate to itself, is there? 21:53:56 you would have to handle it specially when reading 21:54:12 s,ly,, 21:54:18 There's nothing fundamentally wrong with it, and it does not require special reading. 21:54:37 It would be quite easy in Racket to make a language just like Racket, except that () self-evaluated. 21:55:29 Those who are aesthetically displeased with it might argue that it it is fundamentally aesthetically wrong... 21:55:43 Okay, there's nothing *technically* wrong with it. 21:56:27 In Racket, anyway. I have no idea how other Schemes deal with () as an expression or whether they're configurable. 21:56:30 bgs100 [~ian@unaffiliated/bgs100] has joined #scheme 21:57:01 Heh, okay. Thanks :-) 21:58:49 carleastlund: I don't see how you can do this without extending your reader but ok 21:59:10 C-Keen: "Specially" is a word. :-) 21:59:13 The reader is happy to read () in any context. 21:59:25 (quote ()), (let () ...), &c. 21:59:26 Riastradh: Indeed, but the evaluator may not be. 21:59:27 :-) 21:59:49 C-Keen: In Racket, all list expressions (empty or not) are handled by the #%app macro. The default #%app rejects (), but you could easily write one that expands it to (quote ()). 22:00:23 -!- oivindbi_ is now known as oivindbi 22:00:47 -!- mmc1 [~michal@82-148-210-75.fiber.unet.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 22:01:05 In a Scheme where () gives a syntax error without an intermediate step, I agree that a macro might not suffice. I'm not sure how the reader would work, though, because how does the reader know which empty lists are in expression positions and which are serving other purposes? 22:01:45 Any Scheme whose reader rejects () without a preceding ' is fundamentally broken and can't be straightforwardly fixed anyway. 22:02:41 Riastradh, no one implied that a reader rejected (). C-Keen was suggesting that the reader might change its output, however, to turn () into an expression that does not produce a syntax error during compilation. 22:03:10 Any reader doing that is fundamentally broken too... 22:04:08 Right. A reader should produce what forms it's given, no more or less (except ', `, ,, ,@, #', #`, etc.). 22:04:50 -!- tauntaun [~Antoninus@206.205.133.74] has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat] 22:05:08 -!- bttf [~docBrown@c-68-59-124-155.hsd1.fl.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: No route to host] 22:05:16 bttf [~docBrown@c-68-59-124-155.hsd1.fl.comcast.net] has joined #scheme 22:05:30 -!- nilg [~user@77.70.2.229] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 22:06:49 You are right of course 22:10:26 *bremner* likes very much statement that start with "no more or less" and end in "etc." ;) 22:10:37 +s 22:11:20 zanes_ [~zane@wall.tripitinc.com] has joined #scheme 22:11:20 -!- zanes [~zane@wall.tripitinc.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 22:11:21 -!- zanes_ is now known as zanes 22:13:16 -!- tronador_ [~guille@190.145.89.146] has quit [Quit: tronador_] 22:16:47 -!- femtoo [~femto@95-89-248-52-dynip.superkabel.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 22:20:02 bremner: :-) 22:22:36 Agari [~Agari@4.Red-95-121-141.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #scheme 22:28:26 -!- zanes [~zane@wall.tripitinc.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 22:29:50 zanes [~zane@wall.tripitinc.com] has joined #scheme 22:30:29 -!- wav1 [~Adium@184-209-90-52.pools.spcsdns.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 22:32:14 -!- Sveklo [~sveklo@unaffiliated/sveklo] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 22:33:45 -!- gravicappa [~gravicapp@ppp85-141-167-145.pppoe.mtu-net.ru] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 22:35:50 -!- masm [~masm@bl19-129-75.dsl.telepac.pt] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 22:36:15 -!- d2biG is now known as dRbiG 22:38:33 -!- churib [~churib@95.156.194.105] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 22:45:53 -!- copumpkin [~pumpkin@unaffiliated/pumpkingod] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 22:50:48 -!- kilimanjaro [~kilimanja@unaffiliated/kilimanjaro] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 22:52:10 -!- vk0 [~vk@ip-23-75.bnaa.dk] has quit [Read error: Operation timed out] 22:55:04 vk0 [~vk@ip-23-75.bnaa.dk] has joined #scheme 22:55:39 masm [~masm@2.80.129.75] has joined #scheme 22:58:03 -!- rpg [~rpg@mpls.sift.info] has quit [Quit: rpg] 22:59:36 corruptmemory [~jim@ool-18bbd5b2.static.optonline.net] has joined #scheme 23:00:55 -!- rins [~user@173-162-214-174-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)] 23:01:02 copumpkin [~pumpkin@17.101.89.204] has joined #scheme 23:01:02 -!- copumpkin [~pumpkin@17.101.89.204] has quit [Changing host] 23:01:02 copumpkin [~pumpkin@unaffiliated/pumpkingod] has joined #scheme 23:09:02 -!- Blkt [~user@93-33-113-71.ip44.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 23:09:02 -!- homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)] 23:19:34 chemuduguntar [~ravi@118-93-182-106.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz] has joined #scheme 23:37:20 -!- jao [~user@pdpc/supporter/professional/jao] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 23:40:21 -!- vilsonvieira [~vilson@201.47.79.251.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br] has quit [Quit: Saindo] 23:46:28 -!- bweaver [~user@host-68-169-175-225.WISOLT2.epbfi.com] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)] 23:49:09 (it (works) !) 23:49:41 I think you mean (works? it) => #t 23:54:58 -!- HG` [~HG@xdsl-188-118-137-45.dip.osnanet.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 23:55:28 -!- zanes [~zane@wall.tripitinc.com] has quit [Quit: zanes] 23:58:01 srid [~srid@unaffiliated/srid] has joined #scheme 23:58:21 is it really typed "=>"? 23:59:15 homie [~levgue@xdsl-84-44-152-144.netcologne.de] has joined #scheme 23:59:29 -!- Adamant [~Adamant@unaffiliated/adamant] has quit [Quit: Adamant]