01:02:40 alms__ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 01:03:27 -!- alms_ is now known as alms 01:04:36 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 01:04:36 -!- alms__ is now known as alms_ 01:15:47 -!- leo2007 [~leo@cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 01:43:07 rme [~rme@pool-70-105-86-63.chi.dsl-w.verizon.net] has joined #ccl 01:45:51 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: alms_] 01:57:53 alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 01:58:01 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Client Quit] 02:25:43 alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 02:26:01 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Client Quit] 02:46:23 alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 05:15:38 -!- rme [rme@clozure-C6AF7B4D.chi.dsl-w.verizon.net] has quit [Quit: rme] 05:15:38 -!- rme [~rme@pool-70-105-86-63.chi.dsl-w.verizon.net] has quit [Quit: rme] 07:11:47 Modius [~Modius@cpe-70-123-158-125.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #ccl 08:28:38 jdz [~jdz@193.206.22.97] has joined #ccl 08:36:47 leo2007 [~leo@cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com] has joined #ccl 10:58:24 sellout- [~greg@24-176-188-187.static.reno.nv.charter.com] has joined #ccl 11:01:07 -!- sellout [~greg@24-176-188-187.static.reno.nv.charter.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds] 11:01:08 -!- sellout- is now known as sellout 11:22:15 -!- leo2007 [~leo@cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com] has quit [Quit: rcirc on GNU Emacs 23.2.91.3] 14:00:07 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: alms_] 14:10:04 alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 14:12:15 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Client Quit] 14:27:06 alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 15:28:37 rme [~rme@pool-70-105-86-63.chi.dsl-w.verizon.net] has joined #ccl 15:34:16 billstclair [~billstcla@unaffiliated/billstclair] has joined #ccl 15:38:09 -!- sellout [~greg@24-176-188-187.static.reno.nv.charter.com] has quit [Quit: sellout] 15:42:43 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: alms_] 15:43:29 sellout [~greg@24-176-188-187.static.reno.nv.charter.com] has joined #ccl 15:50:16 milanj [~milanj_@77-46-250-105.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs] has joined #ccl 15:51:27 alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 17:16:37 -!- jdz [~jdz@193.206.22.97] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 17:25:07 -!- alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: alms_] 17:26:46 alms_ [~alms_@146-115-42-237.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 18:09:23 anRch [~markmilli@64.134.96.34] has joined #ccl 18:28:22 -!- sellout [~greg@24-176-188-187.static.reno.nv.charter.com] has quit [Quit: sellout] 19:06:28 -!- milanj [~milanj_@77-46-250-105.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 19:10:58 milanj [~milanj_@109-93-23-161.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs] has joined #ccl 19:55:06 -!- anRch [~markmilli@64.134.96.34] has quit [Quit: anRch] 21:29:56 wormphlegm [~wormphleg@c-98-234-185-107.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #ccl 21:38:51 cmbntr [~cmbntr@80-218-229-102.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #ccl 21:39:10 -!- cmbntr [~cmbntr@80-218-229-102.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Client Quit] 22:03:26 -!- milanj [~milanj_@109-93-23-161.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 22:21:03 is there a reason a hash table created with :shared nil would be slower than one with :shared t? 22:24:27 gz? 22:24:38 Gail wrote the lock-free hash table implementation 22:26:04 er, sorry, never mind -- it looks like I'm just seeing the difference between the lock-free and non lock-free algorithms 22:27:03 and by setting :shared to nil I was implicitly setting :lock-free to nil 22:39:59 :shared nil should be the fastest case; lock free is faster for GETHASH but can be slower for (SETF GETHASH). 23:00:27 anRch [~markmilli@64.134.102.4] has joined #ccl 23:29:23 -!- anRch [~markmilli@64.134.102.4] has quit [Quit: anRch]