00:29:19 -!- stassats [~stassats@wikipedia/stassats] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 00:43:41 -!- kanru` [~user@61-228-152-219.dynamic.hinet.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 00:55:52 -!- kwmiebach_ [~kwmiebach@xdsl-87-79-44-189.netcologne.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 02:49:30 -!- |42| [user@2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fedf:3aab] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 02:49:30 |42|` [user@2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fedf:3aab] has joined #sbcl 04:49:29 slyrus_ [~chatzilla@adsl-108-80-231-20.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has joined #sbcl 06:01:47 sdemarre [~serge@91.176.71.221] has joined #sbcl 06:08:06 -!- homie [~levgue@xdsl-78-35-186-31.netcologne.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 06:08:21 -!- wbooze [~wbooze@xdsl-78-35-186-31.netcologne.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 06:38:35 -!- sdemarre [~serge@91.176.71.221] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 06:57:19 fvides [~quassel@56.165.216.87.static.jazztel.es] has joined #sbcl 07:07:10 prxq [~mommer@mnhm-5f75d075.pool.mediaWays.net] has joined #sbcl 07:28:02 -!- slyrus_ [~chatzilla@adsl-108-80-231-20.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 07:30:22 tcr [~tcr@84-72-21-32.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #sbcl 07:31:01 slyrus_ [~chatzilla@adsl-108-80-231-20.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has joined #sbcl 07:31:23 angavrilov [~angavrilo@217.71.227.190] has joined #sbcl 07:59:10 -!- tcr [~tcr@84-72-21-32.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 08:55:49 tcr [~tcr@84-72-21-32.dclient.hispeed.ch] has joined #sbcl 09:17:43 ASau` [~user@176.14.227.238] has joined #sbcl 09:21:39 -!- pchrist [~spirit@gentoo/developer/pchrist] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 09:21:41 pchrist_ [~spirit@gentoo/developer/pchrist] has joined #sbcl 09:21:56 -!- ASau [~user@176.14.227.238] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 09:28:56 -!- whoops [whoops@2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe93:da36] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 09:40:25 whoops [whoops@2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe93:da36] has joined #sbcl 11:06:52 edgar-rft [~me@HSI-KBW-078-043-123-191.hsi4.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has joined #sbcl 11:28:53 -!- _8david [~user@port-92-195-61-68.dynamic.qsc.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds] 12:19:41 kwmiebach [~kwmiebach@xdsl-213-168-118-235.netcologne.de] has joined #sbcl 12:19:50 lichtblau [~user@port-92-195-61-68.dynamic.qsc.de] has joined #sbcl 12:40:56 -!- fvides [~quassel@56.165.216.87.static.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 12:57:20 wbooze [~wbooze@xdsl-87-79-195-70.netcologne.de] has joined #sbcl 13:11:52 -!- kwmiebach [~kwmiebach@xdsl-213-168-118-235.netcologne.de] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 13:12:19 kwmiebach [~kwmiebach@xdsl-213-168-118-235.netcologne.de] has joined #sbcl 13:19:27 homie [~levgue@xdsl-87-79-195-70.netcologne.de] has joined #sbcl 13:22:25 LiamH [~none@132.250.138.103] has joined #sbcl 13:43:05 kanru` [~user@61-228-152-219.dynamic.hinet.net] has joined #sbcl 13:52:09 angavrilov_ [~angavrilo@217.71.227.190] has joined #sbcl 13:53:04 -!- huangjs [~huangjs@190.8.100.83] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 13:54:52 lichtblau: was about to email you about that ppc move fix you committed yesterday, and then took another look. subtle. 13:56:10 -!- angavrilov [~angavrilo@217.71.227.190] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 13:56:19 what's the subtlety? 13:56:33 huangjs [~huangjs@190.8.100.83] has joined #sbcl 13:56:51 that the sign bit on unsigned registers is always 0, so arithmetic shift always works 13:57:30 was not immediately obvious, anyway 14:04:51 right, it's just a stylistic improvement, if you will, in the spirit of helping the future maintenance programmer to not have to think about whether there is a reason that ppc jumps through a hoop the other archs don't (since there isn't). 14:09:56 you mean that if we are even emitting this move to an unsigned register, we already know that the fixnum (if it was a fixnum) was non-negative? 14:10:42 exactly 14:12:20 hmm, forgot to credit hlavaty in the commit for ldb for his help. (Good news everyone: We now support cl-postgres on SBCL/ppc!) 14:13:35 no problem, next time i'll file proper bug report:-D 14:13:55 sorry about that; it's amazing that even knowing that the previous implementation was riddled with bugs I got the new one wrong 15:01:29 So... "Expected failure" means "bug", just as "Failure" also means "bug", but if tests have been marked accordingly, the former means that the bug is old (not a regression), and the latter indicates a fresh bug (a regression). 15:01:30 Correct? 15:05:41 -!- tcr [~tcr@84-72-21-32.dclient.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 15:08:07 yes 15:18:28 OK. Then in that spirit I'll go through sunos/sparc and linux/ppc and mindlessly mark all non-expected failures as expected-failures as a first step, simply to establish a baseline against further regressions. 15:39:45 -!- kanru` [~user@61-228-152-219.dynamic.hinet.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 15:45:42 tcr [~tcr@178-83-229-138.dynamic.hispeed.ch] has joined #sbcl 15:50:42 -!- kwmiebach [~kwmiebach@xdsl-213-168-118-235.netcologne.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 16:27:18 -!- hlavaty [~user@91-66-176-191-dynip.superkabel.de] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:35:53 loke [~elias@bb115-66-85-121.singnet.com.sg] has joined #sbcl 17:09:38 -!- ASau` [~user@176.14.227.238] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 17:15:00 sdemarre [~serge@91.176.71.221] has joined #sbcl 17:26:38 -!- lsenta [u6454@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-mskssdflsbcbmrkv] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] 18:03:06 fvides [~quassel@56.165.216.87.static.jazztel.es] has joined #sbcl 18:09:50 -!- slyrus_ [~chatzilla@adsl-108-80-231-20.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 18:10:23 -!- tcr [~tcr@178-83-229-138.dynamic.hispeed.ch] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 18:15:10 stassats [~stassats@wikipedia/stassats] has joined #sbcl 18:22:37 homie` [~levgue@xdsl-78-35-145-238.netcologne.de] has joined #sbcl 18:23:47 -!- wbooze [~wbooze@xdsl-87-79-195-70.netcologne.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 18:25:43 -!- homie [~levgue@xdsl-87-79-195-70.netcologne.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 18:38:32 -!- huangjs [~huangjs@190.8.100.83] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 19:32:44 antgreen [user@nat/redhat/x-uiynpuhoiewffrjz] has joined #sbcl 19:33:55 ASau [~user@95-26-235-15.broadband.corbina.ru] has joined #sbcl 19:44:42 cool. Didn't realize my computer is fast enough to perform make.sh in under 5min. But it is! 19:46:44 yes! -j4 in make-target-1.sh reduces build time by another 2 seconds! 19:46:44 MORE SPEED 19:58:47 next step: make sbcl itself to be built with -j4 19:58:47 19:58:50 impressive 20:02:39 -!- angavrilov_ [~angavrilo@217.71.227.190] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 20:02:47 -!- Kryztof [~user@81.174.155.115] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 20:03:53 Kryztof [~user@81.174.155.115] has joined #sbcl 20:03:53 -!- ChanServ has set mode +o Kryztof 20:07:26 -!- antgreen [user@nat/redhat/x-uiynpuhoiewffrjz] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 20:20:35 -!- fvides [~quassel@56.165.216.87.static.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 20:48:59 Vivitron [~Vivitron@pool-98-110-213-33.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has joined #sbcl 20:55:43 -!- sdemarre [~serge@91.176.71.221] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 21:15:23 -!- stassats [~stassats@wikipedia/stassats] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] 21:44:31 -!- LiamH [~none@132.250.138.103] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 22:18:01 leuler [~user@p54905011.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #sbcl 22:27:44 I have just been looking through launchpad and found a small FORMAT bug in status triaged that happens to have been fixed by other work, already released with 1.0.57. I intend to add a test for that bug, close the launchpad entry and put a line into NEWS. 22:27:50 Is it OK to add the NEWS entry under "changes in sbcl-1.0.57 relative to sbcl-1.0.56:" or is that not allowed as 1.0.57 is already out? 22:29:15 leuler: I would add a note in the current changeset that the bug was fixed in a previous release. 22:31:22 cmm- [~cmm@bzq-79-181-202-97.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #sbcl 22:32:31 redline6561 [~redline65@li69-162.members.linode.com] has joined #sbcl 22:33:31 pkhuong: OK, will do so. 22:35:28 ivan``_ [~ivan@unaffiliated/ivan/x-000001] has joined #sbcl 22:36:41 -!- ivan`` [~ivan@unaffiliated/ivan/x-000001] has quit [*.net *.split] 22:36:41 -!- mrpat [~mrpat@c-71-60-133-203.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has quit [*.net *.split] 22:36:42 -!- cmm [~cmm@bzq-79-181-202-97.red.bezeqint.net] has quit [*.net *.split] 22:36:42 -!- redline6561_ [~redline65@li69-162.members.linode.com] has quit [*.net *.split] 22:37:34 -!- ivan``_ is now known as ivan`` 22:43:21 mrpat [~mrpat@c-71-60-133-203.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #sbcl 23:36:55 -!- Vivitron [~Vivitron@pool-98-110-213-33.bstnma.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 23:50:41 Does SBCL do any FORMAT optimizations if the format string is constant? 23:51:15 Quadrescence: yes. FORMATTER, basically.