00:31:10 -!- alms_ [~alms_@209-6-130-32.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: alms_] 02:05:25 alms_ [~alms_@209-6-130-32.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 02:09:10 billstclair [~billstcla@unaffiliated/billstclair] has joined #ccl 03:15:10 -!- alms_ [~alms_@209-6-130-32.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Quit: alms_] 03:30:13 -!- rme [rme@925CAFE6.4F96F671.699BA7A6.IP] has quit [Quit: rme] 03:30:13 -!- rme [~rme@50.43.136.254] has quit [Quit: rme] 07:20:14 jdz [~jdz@193.206.22.97] has joined #ccl 07:56:19 -!- gz [~gz@209-6-49-85.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 09:47:06 -!- fe[nl]ix [~quassel@pdpc/supporter/professional/fenlix] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 09:47:15 fe[nl]ix [~quassel@pdpc/supporter/professional/fenlix] has joined #ccl 09:52:17 gz [~gz@209-6-49-85.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 11:02:18 -!- gbyers [~gb@antinomial.abq.clozure.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 11:02:40 gbyers [~gb@c-68-84-152-249.hsd1.nm.comcast.net] has joined #ccl 12:57:21 rme [~rme@50.43.136.254] has joined #ccl 12:58:46 alms_ [~alms_@209-6-130-32.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 13:01:22 -!- alms_ [~alms_@209-6-130-32.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has quit [Client Quit] 13:03:30 alms_ [~alms_@209-6-130-32.c3-0.bkl-ubr1.sbo-bkl.ma.cable.rcn.com] has joined #ccl 13:52:05 udzinari [~user@ip-89-102-12-6.net.upcbroadband.cz] has joined #ccl 13:55:33 -!- udzinari is now known as nyquist` 14:02:13 how do you find initial thread in CCL? 14:05:36 maxm-: well, APROPOS on "initial" shows CCL::CALL-IN-INITIAL-PROCESS and CCL::*INITIAL-LISP-THREAD* 14:05:47 ah already used find 14:05:54 thanks 14:43:59 rme_ [~rme@50.43.143.147] has joined #ccl 14:44:09 -!- rme [rme@925CAFE6.4F96F671.699BA7A6.IP] has quit [Ping timeout] 14:44:10 -!- rme_ is now known as rme 14:45:18 -!- rme [~rme@50.43.136.254] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 14:45:18 -!- rme_ is now known as rme 14:56:03 superjudge [~superjudg@c83-250-198-227.bredband.comhem.se] has joined #ccl 14:58:20 -!- rme [rme@4BDE6233.DEB6CE53.699BA7A6.IP] has quit [Ping timeout] 14:58:58 -!- rme [~rme@50.43.143.147] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds] 15:07:20 -!- nyquist` [~user@ip-89-102-12-6.net.upcbroadband.cz] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 15:30:05 rme [~rme@50.43.142.109] has joined #ccl 15:57:29 milanj [~milanj_@212-200-192-196.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs] has joined #ccl 16:17:58 -!- jdz [~jdz@193.206.22.97] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] 16:26:01 ccl-logbot [~ccl-logbo@setf.clozure.com] has joined #ccl 16:26:01 16:26:01 -!- names: ccl-logbot milanj rme superjudge alms_ gbyers gz fe[nl]ix billstclair pirateking-_- Intensity clop mdc ivan`` sellout PECCU maxm- kanru dnm Fade jasom |3b| @ChanServ 16:49:37 -!- pirateking-_- [~piratekin@c-67-169-182-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has quit [Quit: pirateking-_-] 18:06:59 -!- rme [rme@AE5A245C.F74FD1E8.699BA7A6.IP] has quit [Ping timeout] 18:08:19 -!- rme [~rme@50.43.142.109] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds] 18:24:51 rme [~rme@50.43.154.59] has joined #ccl 18:32:04 rme_ [~rme@50.43.133.91] has joined #ccl 18:32:47 -!- rme [~rme@50.43.154.59] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 18:32:48 -!- rme_ is now known as rme 18:40:08 -!- rme [~rme@50.43.133.91] has quit [Quit: rme] 19:36:12 rme [~rme@50.43.154.23] has joined #ccl 19:36:39 -!- rme [rme@F9E6AB97.ED8853D8.699BA7A6.IP] has quit [Quit: rme] 19:36:39 -!- rme [~rme@50.43.154.23] has quit [Client Quit] 19:37:01 rme [~rme@50.43.154.23] has joined #ccl 20:21:37 -!- superjudge [~superjudg@c83-250-198-227.bredband.comhem.se] has quit [Quit: superjudge] 20:59:40 pirateking-_- [~piratekin@c-67-169-182-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #ccl 21:57:38 -!- milanj [~milanj_@212-200-192-196.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs] has quit [Quit: Leaving] 23:33:33 H4ns [hans@netzhansa.com] has joined #ccl 23:34:08 this seems to be a ccl bug, does it look like a known thing to anyone? 23:34:09 http://paste.lisp.org/display/128639#1 23:34:10 ? 23:35:26 tl;dr: format compiler macro seems to be confused about user-defined formatting functions and ~:*